Saturday, August 29, 2026

FBI Has Lowered Their Hiring Standards Allowing in Those Who Have Engaged in Acts of Bestiality

 The FBI previously refused to hire job applicants if they admitted to hiring sex workers or stealing from an employer — or engaging in acts of bestiality.

Today, those acts, which are mostly illegal across the country, are no longer automatic deal breakers for applicants to the nation's top law enforcement agency.

In June, the FBI quietly lowered some of the standards it uses when it conducts background checks on would-be federal agents and other personnel. According to multiple sources briefed on the matter, the FBI did so to facilitate hiring in some cases, even if candidates acknowledged they engaged in sexually deviant activities or stole from an employer.

The move comes as the FBI has lost scores of employees through firings, retirements and resignations since the start of the Trump administration.

Under specific circumstances, the FBI is willing to give candidates a pass on prostitution, as long as they have not hired sex workers three or more times, the sources told CBS News. And the hiring of the sex workers must not have taken place within the last 10 years, several of the sources added. 

On this part of the guidance, the FBI spokesperson pointed out that a person may have hired a sex worker in a location where prostitution is legal.

A person who was in a position of "trust" who solicited sex would still be automatically disqualified from FBI employment, one of the sources with direct knowledge of the changes told CBS News. 

Examples of positions of trust, according to the FBI's new policy, are those who work in the fields of public safety, education, health, social work, finance or law. Being a member of the military was not among the listed categories, and it was not clear if they would be treated as such.

Under the new eligibility rules, a person who stole from an employer is not automatically disqualified as long as the incident occurred more than three years ago, one of the sources with direct knowledge said. 

The new standards also specifically address applicants who have engaged in past acts of bestiality or animal cruelty – saying they may still be considered for the bureau as long as the incidents took place before the age of 18, the sources said. 

An FBI spokesperson confirmed that some changes to the eligibility requirements have taken place, but claimed they are limited to a narrow set of circumstances, such as in cases where a person was sexually abused with animals as a child.

"Any polygraph changes reflect a clear difference between a disqualified applicant who has engaged in criminal behavior, versus an applicant who may be subject to further evaluation based on rare exigent circumstances," the spokesperson said.

Sources told CBS News that the new eligibility requirements do not distinguish between candidates who were coerced into sexual activity with animals, as opposed to those who engaged in such acts willingly.

Former FBI agent James Davidson, who now leads the nonprofit FBI Integrity Project, opposes changing this standard. 

"Bestiality is clearly a potential indication of a more serious emotional issue, and even in a circumstance where it is not, the pool of candidates should be extensive enough that the criteria should certainly not be eliminated," he said.

Changes communicated in June

The changes to the policy were communicated to FBI personnel who are involved in the background check process in a June 16 internal memo known as an "electronic communication," according to sources with direct knowledge of the memo's contents.

An archived FBI webpage from 2023 on special agent hiring requirements shows that "engagement in prostitution or bestiality" are listed as "automatic disqualifiers" for employment. 

A similar version of that document on general eligibility rules currently posted on the FBI's website contains no references to bestiality or prostitution as being disqualifying.

The idea behind some of the new guidelines is to consider the whole person in the application process, as opposed to automatically disqualifying someone based on one factor, one of the sources said.  

But current and former FBI employees have concerns the changes could lead the bureau to hire people with questionable backgrounds.

It could raise concerns about the integrity of agents who are tasked with investigating crimes such as human trafficking because those agents often have to testify in court, they said.

The FBI's new policy also runs counter to the views in an April 2015 memo issued to all Justice Department staff that prohibited the solicitation of prostitution. A DOJ spokesperson confirmed the memo remains in effect.

Although the memo does not explicitly address job applicants, the restrictions apply to all employees, contractors and subcontractors.

"This rule applies at all times during an individual's employment, including while off duty or on personal leave, and applies regardless of whether the activity is legal or tolerated in a particular jurisdiction, foreign or domestic," the Holder memo states.

The memo added that soliciting sex not only "invites extortion, blackmail and leaks of sensitive or classified information," but also "undermines the department's efforts to eradicate the scourge of human trafficking."

Broader talent pool concerns

Former FBI agents and attorneys who handle employment issues for agents told CBS News the decision to lower the standards could lead the bureau to hire people with a history of aberrant behavior and points to broader challenges in recruiting qualified applicants. 

"If they are lowering standards, it means the pool of candidates has sufficiently shrunk," Davidson said.

Mark Zaid, a Washington lawyer who represents FBI agents and is familiar with the bureau's hiring practices, agreed.  

"How can this not be reflective of a recruiting problem at the FBI if you are lowering your standards on issues like bestiality and prostitution," he said. 

In a statement, an FBI spokesperson denied that the bureau is allowing people who have a history of criminal sexual acts to work there, and said the FBI "has and always will maintain some of the highest suitability standards for its applicants and employees in the U.S. government."

"Over the years, the FBI has had a number of applicants who suffered sexual abuse in their past, causing polygraph questions about prostitution, bestiality, or other similar issues to affect their polygraph through zero fault of their own," the spokesperson said.

But former FBI officials told CBS News that candidates who are survivors of sexual abuse involving bestiality would have the opportunity to address those issues in an interview before they are hooked up to a polygraph.

"Part of the polygraph process is a conversation with the person who is going to be polygraphed and the polygrapher to explore and explain and discuss anything in their background in a private manner that may be concerning to them," said former Supervisory Special Agent Katherine Schweit, whose assignments over the years included serving as a supervisor for human resources.

One of the sources familiar with the changes told CBS News that during the interview process now, applicants are asked questions about whether they have engaged in what is described as sexually deviant behavior. 

If they acknowledge hiring prostitutes or engaging in bestiality, they are then asked the additional questions about when the conduct took place or in the case of prostitution, how many times it took place. Even if a candidate technically meets the hiring criteria, it does not guarantee an employment offer.

FBI Director Kash Patel has not publicly acknowledged the changes on prostitution or bestiality, but he has more broadly spoken about his belief that the FBI needed to update its hiring standards in general.

In a video interview with Patel posted on July 27 with former FBI agent John Nantz, Patel discussed some of his efforts to overhaul older hiring standards to entice new recruits.

"We are losing too many qualified candidates to the rigors of the requirements from yesteryear," he said, citing as one example a new and more relaxed rule on hiring people with prior law enforcement experience.  

"We've never had recruiting numbers and application numbers this high in the history of the bureau. We're not reducing our standards — we're actually making it harder. You've got to be fit to be an FBI agent."

The polygraph process

The FBI has long used polygraph tests as part of the vetting of new recruits — from agents and analysts to support staff. During the interview process, applicants are screened to ensure they have not committed certain crimes. 

Applicants are also asked about other topics, including any history of drug use and any foreign contacts. Over the years, the bureau has changed some of its standards and has, for instance, relaxed some restrictions on the use of recreational drugs like marijuana.

Bestiality is a crime in nearly every state, while prostitution is illegal in most states with a few narrow exceptions. Prostitution is legal or decriminalized in dozens of countries around the world. It is illegal in the United States, with the exception of some counties in Nevada.

Former FBI agents say questions about this type of behavior are also important to ask because having such a history could make an agent more vulnerable to blackmail by criminals or a foreign power.

"I don't think anybody who has been involved with prostitution is trustworthy. You could be compromised," said one retired agent who specialized in polygraphs. "You can be lured in and trapped, and it can be held over your head."

The FBI was rocked by a prostitution scandal after the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General released a two-page report in 2021 saying a handful of officials had solicited sex while overseas in countries including Cambodia, the Philippines and Thailand.

A more detailed version of the report was released several years later through public records requests from media outlets.

Last July, the Justice Department inspector general substantiated claims that a supervisory special agent had hired prostitutes while traveling overseas on an assignment and used an FBI-issued mobile device to solicit them for sex. The report did not say whether the agent was disciplined or removed, but it noted that prosecution was declined.

FBI lost over 1,000 special agents in 2025

Former FBI analyst Philip Fields reviewed government personnel data and found that in 2025 alone, the FBI lost 1,139 special agents, with an average tenure of 21.8 years. His review was published by the nonprofit advocacy group Justice Connection. The FBI says it employs around 13,700 agents

Some of the agents and analysts who have been fired were assigned to cases that the Trump administration disliked, such as those pertaining to the investigations into President Trump's retention of classified documents and efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

"After driving out thousands of career employees, DOJ has struggled to fill those positions for many reasons — including the fact that no one wants to be ordered to conduct politically driven investigations that are often unethical, illegal or unconstitutional," said Stacey Young, a former Justice Department attorney who now runs the nonprofit advocacy group Justice Connection.

The Justice Department's Civil Division has started offering signing bonuses to try to attract more lawyers. And last year, the FBI sought to entice retired agents to return to its employ.

FBI lowered other hiring standards last year

The New York Times reported last year that the FBI was lowering other hiring standards, removing a requirement that all agents hold a bachelor's degree and reducing the number of weeks that agents must undergo training at Quantico from 18 weeks to eight weeks.

The FBI's website still states that a college degree is required to be a special agent. However, Patel has since unveiled a few other changes to hiring standards for agents.

Previously, special agent applicants were required to have worked in law enforcement for two years after college. Patel said in the July 27 interview, the FBI will now consider applications from candidates who have worked in law enforcement for just one year.

"If you've been a cop for a year and you have an interest in the FBI, no more two-year requirement window after college," Patel said during his video interview with Nantz. "Come on in. Quantico is going to screen you out if you can't make it. Same with members of the military. We want those folks."

ProPublica previously reported that some of Patel's hires, including his personal assistant, did not clear their polygraph tests and required waivers in order to be able to work at the bureau. The FBI spokesman quoted in that article called the reporting "false" and said the bureau "follows all laws and procedures on personnel security measures."

Thursday, July 30, 2026

Officer Robert A. Parks Indicted on Attempted Murder and Related Charges

Baltimore, Md. (November 12, 2025) – Today, the Office of the State’s Attorney for Baltimore City’s Public Trust & Police Integrity Unit announced the indictment of Baltimore Police Officer Robert A. Parks on charges of Second-Degree Attempted Murder, First-Degree Assault, Second-Degree Assault, Reckless Driving, and Misconduct in Office. If found guilty of all charges, Officer Parks faces a maximum sentence of 65 years of incarceration. There is no maximum penalty for Misconduct. An indictment is not a finding of guilt. An individual charged by indictment is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty at trial. Chief of the Public Trust and Police Integrity Unit, Steven Trostle, will prosecute this case. “The charges brought forward in this indictment reflect the serious and dangerous nature of the actions we all witnessed in the video of Officer Parks. These are the same charges we would bring forward for anyone operating a vehicle in this manner,” said State’s Attorney Ivan J. Bates. “When a police officer threatens the safety of those they are sworn to protect, it erodes the crucial trust between the community and law enforcement that is critical to the historic reductions in violent crime in our city and essential to keeping Baltimore safe.” The indictment alleges that on October 28, 2025, at approximately 5:00 p.m., Officer Robert Parks drove to Wylie Liquors Bar located at 3101 Wylie Avenue, where several individuals were standing on the sidewalk. Officer Parks then exited his vehicle and approached the civilians. He stated, “It’s getting a little hot, guys. I just need you guys to take a lap, you know.” In response, one of the individuals began walking away. As the other individuals walked away, Officer Parks got back into his patrol vehicle and drove a brief distance westbound on Wylie Avenue, stopping along the curb to the right of the first person who had left the liquor store corner. Officer Parks called the individual by name to come over and then got out of his vehicle again. He stated, “Don’t make it worse. I’m going to be straight up with you. I’m going to be straight up with you. You gotta come...” Officer Parks motioned with his index finger to indicate that the individual should walk towards him. The individual said, “No,” and turned and walked away. As the person walked away, Officer Parks yelled out, “All right, I’m gonna call the dogs and come get you.” As the person was walking away on a paved driveway, Officer Parks returned to his patrol vehicle and stated over the radio, “I have one running, adult male...in the alley.” Officer Parks proceeded to drive his police cruiser into a paved driveway directly at the individual and with increasing speed. The person ran to his left into a grassy area to avoid being struck. Officer Parks steered his police vehicle directly at the man and struck him in the grassy area. After being hit, the man ran away from the patrol car and then towards Wylie Avenue. Officer Parks continued to drive at the man, who then ran onto the sidewalk and between a utility pole and a fence. Officer Parks then drove his vehicle onto the sidewalk and between the utility pole and the fence directly at the man. The individual then ran towards an alleyway behind residences and businesses. Officer Parks made a U-turn and drove down the same alley, ploughing through a stationary chain-link fence and into the backyard of 3129 Sumter Avenue, nearly striking the man and causing him to jump over a fence to avoid being hit. At that time, Officer Parks’ vehicle became disabled, and he exited and pursued the man on foot. However, he stopped within seconds of initiating the foot chase to return to his patrol car.

Thursday, June 04, 2026

Jamaican police officer charged with murder after woman shot during protest

 Andrew Wilson appears in court over killing of Latoya Bulgin at protest over a police shooting days earlier.

Authorities in Jamaica have taken the rare step of charging a police officer with murder after he was accused of shooting a 45-year-old woman in a case that prompted violent protests.

According to the Independent Commission of Investigations (Indecom), Constable Andrew Wilson appeared in court on Wednesday and was denied bail. Another hearing is scheduled for mid-June.

The killing of Latoya “Buju” Bulgin on 17 May in north-west Jamaica sparked protests after footage circulated on social media showing an officer firing at her vehicle during a demonstration over police violence.

According to Indecom, police were “conducting crowd control duties” during a protest in Granville, St James, against a police shooting days earlier, in which 17-year-old Tjey Edwards, identified by local media as Bulgin’s cousin, was killed.

In the CCTV footage, Bulgin’s minivan is seen stationary at the side of the road as several people climb out. Police officers can be seen standing nearby. With one of the side doors still open, the vehicle starts to pull out into the road.

Apparently without warning, an officer standing a few feet in front of the vehicle pulls a handgun and shoots at the driver, amid screams and cries from people nearby. Some people are seen running.

Police officers are seen dragging Bulgin’s limp body out of the car and on to the ground and putting her in the back of a police pickup truck. The officers do not appear to make any attempt to offer first aid to the injured woman.

Indecom and Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ), a human rights group, have been calling for strengthened accountability in police fatal shootings through mechanisms such as body-worn cameras. No body camera was worn by the police officer accused of shooting Bulgin, and JFJ said the incident demonstrated the importance of independent footage.

“Without the availability of that CCTV footage, we would not be in the position to even be having this conversation and we would not perhaps have seen the JCF high command responding,” the group’s executive director, Mickel Jackson, told Radio Jamaica News last month.

In a statement on Wednesday, Indecom said the “prompt collection and analysis of video evidence” during its independent investigation into Bulgin’s death “assisted in establishing an objective understanding of this fatal shooting incident”.

The commission has reported 140 fatal shootings so far this year in the country of 2.8 million people. Last year, JFJ staged a protest against what it described as a “significant and alarming” increase in fatal shootings by police.

The PNP Women’s Movement, a branch of the opposition People’s National party, said the CCTV footage “raises serious questions about the use of lethal force by members of the security forces”.

It also said it was “disturbing” how Bulgin’s body was thrown into the back of a police vehicle after she was shot. “This conduct falls below the respect that should be afforded to our citizens by members of the Jamaica Constabulary Force,” the group said.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights denounced Bulgin’s killing and urged a “prompt, independent, impartial and transparent

Officer nearly shoots student playing with water gun in a senior game

 A Michigan officer nearly shot a student playing a "water wars" game, a local school district says.

Body camera footage obtained by ABC News on Thursday shows an officer investigating a report when he came across an individual dressed in a blue hoodie and sweats, seemingly holding a water gun and a cell phone.

A message Davison Community Schools Superintendent Matt Lobban sent to parents, obtained by ABC News, urged students not to play the game, risking catastrophe.

According to the message, the officer was investigating suspicious activity when he came across the student.

This is a screen grab from the bodycam footage released by the Davison Township Police Department.
Davison Township Police Department

"That is when a student jumped out at the officer, whose gun was drawn, and shot his squirt gun, getting the officer wet," read the message.

"We are so very thankful that the officer, in spite of it being dark out, was able to determine that the student was not a threat and no one was hurt," the message continued.

The individual can be heard apologizing, and the officer responding, "you are a very lucky guy."

This is a screen grab from the bodycam footage released by the Davison Township Police Department.
Davison Township Police Department

The message read, "We are reaching out today because we are very concerned that someone is going to get seriously hurt - or worse - as seniors engage in the game of 'water wars' following an incident that occurred last night."

The school said the student was playing the popular water wars game, seemingly similar to "senior assassin," where large groups of classmates track each other down and record a water "attack" in order to advance to the next round.

Senior assassin incidents have already caused quite a stir in neighborhoods across the country, leading to warnings from local police in states across the country, including Louisiana, Indiana and New Jersey.

Officer arrested after allegedly pointing firearm at fellow cop over microwaved fish: Warrant

 The Myrtle Beach Police Department said Michael Debiase is no longer employed.

A now-former South Carolina police officer faces a felony charge after allegedly pointing his department-issued firearm at a fellow officer during a confrontation about microwaved fish, according to authorities and an arrest warrant.

Michael Debiase, 46, was arrested on Tuesday and charged with pointing and presenting a firearm at a person, according to the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, which investigated the incident.

The confrontation allegedly occurred on Saturday in a briefing room at the Myrtle Beach Police Department, authorities said.

Debiase allegedly confronted a fellow officer who was "warming up fish in the microwave, causing an odor in the office," the arrest warrant stated. During the confrontation, the detective allegedly "drew and pointed his department-issued handgun" at the other officer, the arrest warrant stated. 

Both officers provided statements, according to the arrest warrant. The other officer was not publicly identified. 

Debiase was immediately placed on administrative leave amid investigations by the Myrtle Beach Police Department's Office of Professional Standards and the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, police said.

The Myrtle Beach Police Department said in a statement Tuesday that it has "recently separated employment" with Debiase.

"Based on information learned during the Office of Professional Standards investigation, several policy violations were identified," the Myrtle Beach Police Department said in a statement Tuesday.

"This incident does not reflect the values demonstrated by the men and women of the Myrtle Beach Police Department every day," the statement added. "However, it does demonstrate our commitment to accountability and our willingness to address conduct that falls short of our expectations."

It is illegal to point a loaded or unloaded firearm at another person under South Carolina law. Police did not say whether Debiase's firearm was loaded during the alleged confrontation. 

Debiase was booked into the detention center in Horry County, police said. His bond was set at $5,000 during a hearing on Tuesday, court records show. His next hearing has been scheduled for Aug. 14.

Online court records do not mention any attorney information. Debiase did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

Former Englewood Police Officer Charged in Controversial Traffic Stop

 ARAPAHOE COUNTY —The 18th Judicial District Attorney’s Office has charged former Englewood police officer Ryan Scott Vasina, 30, with multiple criminal offenses stemming from a traffic stop he conducted while on-duty last month.


On the evening of October 8, 2025, Vasina was on patrol near W. Union and S. Broadway when an Audi convertible drove past him while he was stationary. Vasina decided to follow the car, and while following the vehicle, Vasina observed the driver failing to stop at a stop sign. He activated his overhead lights to conduct a traffic stop.

The driver pulled over and rolled down his window. Officer Vasina asked the driver for his license, but there appeared to be a language barrier as the driver did not speak English well. The driver asked why he was stopped, but Vasina did not answer him. Vasina then called for a second patrol unit and asked the driver to turn off his car, which he did. Vasina then walked over to the driver’s side door, opened it, and ordered the driver out of the car.
Vasina then went on his radio and advised dispatch that the driver was fighting. However, a review of the evidence, including the officer’s body-worn camera, did not reveal any evidence of the driver fighting, such as punching, kicking, or striking the officer.

Vasina then pulled out his taser and told the driver in English that he is going to tase him. Approximately 1 second later, Vasina discharged his taser. Vasina then took the driver to the ground in a choke hold maneuver. The driver was arrested and booked into jail on multiple charges, which were dismissed after a thorough review by our office.

“It is evident from the video footage of the interaction between Officer Vasina and the driver that a language barrier existed, and that Vasina responded with visible frustration and anger,” Assistant District Attorney Ryan Brackley reiterated from the arrest warrant. “The initial nexus of the stop was a car driving by Vasina that changed lanes in a way that appeared ‘suspicious’ to Vasina. The penalty for failing to stop at a stop sign or even refusing to provide identification does not warrant a use of force response that Vasina engaged in, particularly where there was no active resistance, threatening language, furtive movements or attempts to flee or evade.”

The type of chokehold used during this traffic stop is forbidden by state law, and all chokeholds are prohibited under the Englewood Police Department’s Use of Force policy unless deadly force is authorized.

Following a review of this incident, Vasina is facing the following charges:

Second-Degree Assault (F4)
First-Degree Official Misconduct (M1)
Third-Degree Assault (M1)

“State law makes it clear that officers shall apply non-violent means, when possible, before resorting to the use of physical force,” District Attorney Amy Padden said. “The law also directs them to use only a degree of force consistent with the minimization of injury to others. The traffic violations that the driver was allegedly stopped for are not arrestable crimes and the driver did not resist, fight, or fail to comply with lawful orders before force was used against him.”

Vasina was officially terminated from the Englewood Police Department last month.

“The former officer’s conduct does not reflect the values of the Englewood Police Department,” Chief David Jackson said. “Our officers are expected to serve with professionalism, respect, and restraint. We are committed to transparency in addressing any incident that falls short of those expectations.”
Information contained in this release is publicly available in the Arrest Warrant. All public records can be requested and obtained via the Courts. As a reminder, all defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.

We thank the Englewood Police Department for its full cooperation throughout this investigation. We also acknowledge the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which proactively offered additional support and resources to ensure a thorough review of the facts. All future updates on this case with come from the 18th Judicial District Attorney's public information officer.